<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.10" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TSMC catches up with Intel on 45nm production</title>
	<link>http://www.asic-vlsi.com/blog/2007/05/24/tsmc-catches-up-with-intel-on-45nm-production/</link>
	<description>Ruminations on trends in the microelectronics / semiconductor world.......</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 02:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.10</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: sanjay</title>
		<link>http://www.asic-vlsi.com/blog/2007/05/24/tsmc-catches-up-with-intel-on-45nm-production/#comment-13</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 06:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.asic-vlsi.com/blog/2007/05/24/tsmc-catches-up-with-intel-on-45nm-production/#comment-13</guid>
					<description>I think it's a good news for AMD. Intel is increasing the die size by integrating more cores in one die and AMD has to play the catch up game. Atleast this another 45nm fab (besides the IBM one) will make sure that AMD gets as many chips as it can sell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a good news for AMD. Intel is increasing the die size by integrating more cores in one die and AMD has to play the catch up game. Atleast this another 45nm fab (besides the IBM one) will make sure that AMD gets as many chips as it can sell.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
